If motion to be reconsidered is debatable, in which case debate can go into that questionĪ matter that was voted on could be brought back again through the motion to reconsider. When another has been assigned the floor, but not after he has begun to speak Motion that brings a question again before the assembly
#Sample motion for reconsideration doc code#
The amendments to Rule 49 rearranged the Rule to define better which provisions apply to motions for rehearing and which provisions apply to motions for en banc reconsideration. On May 25, 2021, the Texas Supreme Court and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals approved rule changes that clarified Rule 49. It was uncertain what the term “when permitted” meant. The problem arose because the rule specified that motions for en banc reconsideration “must be filed within 15 days after the court of appeals’ judgment or order, or when permitted, within 15 days after the court of appeals’ denial of the party’s last timely filed motion for rehearing or en banc reconsideration.” TRAP 49.7 (emphasis added).
Notably, the Dallas Court of Appeals convened en banc and generated three separate opinions regarding the deadline to file a motion for en banc reconsideration under Rule 49.7. For some time, litigants and courts have labored to understand the rule’s provisions governing the timing for filing a motion for en banc reconsideration. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure (TRAP) 49 governs the filing of motions for rehearing and motions for en banc reconsideration in the courts of appeals.